But when I mention that I don’t see homosexuality as a ‘natural’ way of life, seeing that heterosexuality is necessary for life to continue, I get; “you fucking bigot, homophobic asshole.”
Like, WTF man?
See, you need to be believe everyone is perfectly normal, especially the transexuals, or else you’re a neocon and deserve to die.
That’s something I don’t quite understand myself about the liberals. They are so for equality, and so pro-science and Darwinism, but the second those things clash with their personal beliefs, such as the view on homosexuality, they start crying and whining. Survival of the fittest, or a part of Darwinism, would dictate that since homosexual couplings are not offspring producing, then the trait really should die out with the generation. Since we see multiple generations of homosexuality, and it’s rather correlated with abuse of some kind, or neglect, then that would logically make it a form of mental disorder and therefore need to be treated, again, making homosexuality a curable mental illness. I know I’m going to get hate so much for this, but I’m trying to make a point here. Homosexuality cannot be both something you are born with, and something you choose. I’ve heard both arguments. By far, the most popular argument is that this group of people is “born that way”, and therefore, Darwinism would need to be in effect. It would make homosexuality a genetic trait, a recessive trait, and something that would need to be passed down from parent to child. This would mean that the trait would have died out centuries, even millenniums ago. If the coupling cannot produce offspring, the trait cannot be passed onto a new generation. This supports my belief that it has to be a lifestyle choice. Whether conscious or not, it is still a choice made by your brain whether it be to protect you from a painful childhood memory, or to relive the abuse pattern.
Heterosexuality is not necessary for life because one does not have to be a heterosexual in order to procreate. A gay man or woman can still procreate with the opposite sex and pass on their genes or, considering the advances in technology, do nothing at all and still pass on their genes.
A man’s sperm does not stop working because he’s gay and a female’s ovaries do not stop producing eggs because she’s gay, therefore the trait would not have a reason to “die out”. Like I said, homosexual humans can procreate with the opposite sex, and they would if they were wild animals that had no other way (surrogacy) to pass on their genes.
“Homosexuality cannot be both something you are born with, and something you choose.”
You are born homosexual, but you do choose who to sleep with. If I, a gay man, wanted to have sex with a female, I could and that would not change my sexuality because sexuality is not dependent on who one has sex with.